http://paulmcdevitt.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/kevin-rose-offers-insight-into-digg-algorithm/ It's about Paul McDevitt, among other things... Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:45:00 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://paulmcdevitt.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/kevin-rose-offers-insight-into-digg-algorithm/#comment-79 Insight into the Digg Algo, Take 2 « Paul McDevitt’s Blog Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:43:33 +0000 http://paulmcdevitt.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-79 [...] Paul McDevitt’s Links Kevin Rose Offers Insight into Digg Algorithm [...] [...] Paul McDevitt’s Links Kevin Rose Offers Insight into Digg Algorithm [...]

]]> http://paulmcdevitt.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/kevin-rose-offers-insight-into-digg-algorithm/#comment-78 Research? Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:32:43 +0000 http://paulmcdevitt.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-78 This is really old news ... you could have asked any top Digger and they would have told you: 99.9% of submits that make the front do it in 24 hours ... very rarely does something make it after that. Didn't need to cite the podcast for this info ... This is really old news … you could have asked any top Digger and they would have told you: 99.9% of submits that make the front do it in 24 hours … very rarely does something make it after that. Didn’t need to cite the podcast for this info …

]]> http://paulmcdevitt.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/kevin-rose-offers-insight-into-digg-algorithm/#comment-70 Thanh Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:37:38 +0000 http://paulmcdevitt.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-70 Wow, so unless you're getting mad diggs on the day of submission, then you've a snowball's chance in hell of getting to the front page? I'd say that's a little too strict and skews too much towards news drivel. I think that's ironic because sometimes the best news is stuff that is hard to find and actually had been passed over by people...hence by digging it, it can receive the popularity it truly deserves. You'd end up top heavy with articles that are light on content, but had the benefit of simply being there first, wouldn't you? Wow, so unless you’re getting mad diggs on the day of submission, then you’ve a snowball’s chance in hell of getting to the front page? I’d say that’s a little too strict and skews too much towards news drivel. I think that’s ironic because sometimes the best news is stuff that is hard to find and actually had been passed over by people…hence by digging it, it can receive the popularity it truly deserves. You’d end up top heavy with articles that are light on content, but had the benefit of simply being there first, wouldn’t you?

]]>